Milan’s Smithfield Plant Under Scrutiny Over COVID Numbers

PROTECTED CONTENT

If you’re a current subscriber, log in below. If you would like to subscribe, please click the subscribe tab above.

Username

Password

Login

Lost your password?

Username and Password Help

Please enter your email and we will send your username and password to you.

Email

Submit

← Back

By Madison McVan, Courtesy of the Missouri Independent

This story was originally published by The Midwest Center for Investigative Reporting.

May 17, 2021 – The COVID-19 outbreak at Smithfield Foods’ northern Missouri plant — the focus of a worker safety lawsuit that garnered national attention last year — resulted in two worker deaths and was worse than previously thought, according to newly obtained federal documents.

Early on in the pandemic, the Sullivan County Health Department told local news station KTVO that 14 workers in Milan plant had tested positive. And in late May 2020, the local hospital director told the St. Louis Post- Dispatch that 35 cases were tied to the plant. Since then, the health department and the company have declined to provide figures that would show the outbreak’s scope.

But the Occupational Safety and Health Administration found the total number of cases was likely more than double what has been previously reported. By the end of May 2020, at least 77 workers were presumed to be positive for the virus, and more than 300 were either suspected to have the virus or had been in close contact with a positive case.

Also, at least two workers at the plant died from the virus last year, according to the OSHA inspections obtained by the Midwest Center for Investigative Reporting. One died July 7, 2020, and the other died Oct. 22, 2020.

The health department does not track coronavirus cases by employer, administrator Deborah Taylor told the Midwest Center in April. Smithfield, which employs about 1,100 people at its Milan facility, told OSHA inspectors the company determined that the employees who died had contracted the virus from close contacts outside of work, rather than in the plant.

In a statement, Smithfield’s chief administrative officer, Keira Lombardo, said it has dedicated “more than $800 million” to responding to the COVID-19 pandemic.

“We continue to see a sustained period of extremely low reported cases across our employee workforce and we continue to work diligently to assist in ensuring that the safe and effective vaccines are available to each employee,” she said. “We continue to hear from our employees, including in Milan, how grateful and supportive they are of the response we have undertaken, together, to mitigate the impact of the virus as we continue to provide food.”

Axel Fuentes suspects the real case numbers are much higher than the counts listed in the OSHA reports.

He’s the executive director of the Rural Community Workers Alliance, which advocates for better working conditions on behalf of Smithfield workers, and has been in close contact with the plant’s employees throughout the pandemic.

At the time, Sonny Perdue, former President Donald Trump’s pick to lead the U.S. Department of Agriculture, praised the decision to dismiss the case.

The day after he took office, President Joe Biden issued an executive order directing OSHA and other federal agencies to evaluate the need for emergency standards to protect workers during the coronavirus pandemic by March 15. Six weeks after the deadline, the agency has yet to publish an emergency standard.

On April 26, OSHA said in a press release that it had sent a draft of the standard to the White House for review. It’s unclear how long that process could take.

“OSHA has been working diligently on its proposal and has taken the appropriate time to work with its science-agency partners, economic agencies, and others in the U.S. government to get this proposed emergency standard right,” it said in a statement.

Fuentes said in the absence of an emergency standard for the covid-19 pandemic, it’s harder to hold employers accountable for implementing virus mitigation measures.

He wants to see OSHA require meatpacking companies to implement a larger distance between workers on the line, instead of just the plastic dividers currently used as a barrier; a reduced line speed that would allow workers to cover a cough, wash their hands or change their mask as necessary; and more handwashing stations closer to the lines.

OSHA fined Smithfield the maximum penalty allowed by law, $13,494, for failing to protect employees of its meatpacking plant in Sioux Falls, South Dakota.

At that plant, at least four employees died of coronavirus and nearly 1,300 got sick.

The Smithfield fine is one of only a handful of penalties that have been issued against meatpacking companies throughout the pandemic. To date, more than 50,000 meatpacking workers have tested positive for coronavirus and at least 250 have died, according to Midwest Center tracking.